I just purchased it, and will be downloading it soon. I didn't have the full woodwinds before, only the Synchron Prime.I bought the original ww and made a couple videos, then returned it before the first round of updates. Now with this round of updates, I wonder if I’ll like them better.
Anyone feel like posting a couple examples of without and with the newest changes?
You’ve got to be kidding me.all of the issues you had pointed out are not there.
Yes and no. Just like with most things in sample land. It’s great at many lines but sometimes within, even a lyrical phrase, the normal legato works better. So it’s a great addition but not a replacementWhat's the general consensus? Would you use the new lyrical legato for all the slower legato passages, or the older, faster one could still be useful as an alternative?
And should the older fast legato be replaced by the new virtuosic one, or is it still an usable alternative?
Paolo
Yeah, I think you'll find it a huge difference from when you did your original video. I think back then the second soloists did not exist, and because VSL messed up the oboes and mixed up the first and second soloist, the better solo oboe is actually the second one (as it was supposed to be Oboe 1).Maybe I need to take another look.
Trying to set some realistic expectations: It is still very much the same library.Maybe I need to take another look.
the note transitions of the new legatos are stunning. I compared them to the other legato presets and for me it's night and day. incredible update by VSL!Personally, I think it's more than just an simple update, it's the missing piece. I was a bit disappointed with the flute legato in the context of a solo, but now it's really top-notch, it's even super playable. You can mix it with the normal legato to vary your playing. As I understand it, this is a patch that uses existing samples. I hope we'll see similar updates for all Synchron libraries (Synchron Strings/Elite, etc.), I think it will put an end to a large part of the legato critics. Great job!
Generally new lyrical legatos are better suited for slow and yep Lyrical passages, but in some cases old ones might work better, so it's very nice to have a choice! I personally hope that maybe we'll see even more new lyrical legatos for other woods (and maybe more Brass too??!)!)What's the general consensus? Would you use the new lyrical legato for all the slower legato passages, or the older, faster one could still be useful as an alternative?
And should the older fast legato be replaced by the new virtuosic one, or is it still an usable alternative?
Paolo
So, I think in my expression maps the Lyrical/Virtuosic legato will become the standard one, and the Regular/Fast one will be an alternative, to be recalled with a different switch (in Dorico, I could add something like a "fast" technique to a legato passage).in some cases old ones might work better
I suspect they already felt that their solo trumpets were pretty good as-is, and that's why we only got the horns with the lyrical legato.Generally new lyrical legatos are better suited for slow and yep Lyrical passages, but in some cases old ones might work better, so it's very nice to have a choice! I personally hope that maybe we'll see even more new lyrical legatos for other woods (and maybe more Brass too??!)!)
Oh, I didn't know about more winds, that's very cool!I suspect they already felt that their solo trumpets were pretty good as-is, and that's why we only got the horns with the lyrical legato.
They already announced they were coming out with lyrical legatos for the other winds.
I don't think this is the case, and that instead, they had to redo the recordings from scratch. Herb explained it in the "Upcoming Projects" video on the VSL site (I've linked directly to the appropriate segment):As I understand it, this is a patch that uses existing samples.
Especially in winter, here in the northern hemisphere!Oh, I didn't know about more winds, that's very cool!
I really appreciate your kind reply. If I decide to give it another go, I’ll keep my expectations tempered.Trying to set some realistic expectations: It is still very much the same library.
And with regards to the comments you made in that video of yours, I do not think that you would enjoy it more than CSW for tone or IW for playability because it doesn't beat either one of them according to how I feel you'd want it.
In context it is way more capable than your first impression would have it seem. But I do not think your personal preferences vibe well with this one if you enjoy CSW as much as you do and it offers all the articulations you might need - and you don't care about it's spicy crossfades.