What's new

Berlin Woodwinds Legacy vs Revive - Hear the Difference!

Hey, I'm a Mac user, too. It really isn't that hard.
If I begin to use them again, I might actually do that.

It has suddenly occurred to me that when DWH ported BWW to StaffPad, he had access to the Legacy samples because there was no Sine version yet. I now find myself wondering if the samples that I have loved in StaffPad are actually from Legacy.
 
I believe it's (mostly?) the same samples + some new content, but I'm wondering where the new mic positions for the old samples came from :roflmao:
On my Beyerdynamic headphones, I'm getting some background rumble on the Revive instruments.

[Common problem in past decades with recordings in large spaces due to outside traffic that has not been filtered]
 
@Trash Panda (or anyone else if you want to compare it to your own libraries) here you go :)
Ableton won't let me export more than one midi clip at a time, so I fused the different clips into one. I also left the key switches in for you to know when I switched articulations - for all shorts I used the normal staccato articulation btw., not the staccatissimo one.
Do you recall the articulations used for the Clarinet and the tempo?

Here are flutes and oboes. All tree mic only.

BWW SINE Flute 1:
View attachment BWW Revive Flute 1.mp3

BWW SINE Flute 2:
View attachment BWW Revive Flute 2.mp3

BWW SINE Flute 3:
View attachment BWW Revive Flute 3.mp3

BWW SINE Oboe 1:
View attachment BWW Revive Oboe 1.mp3

BWW SINE Oboe 2:
View attachment BWW Revive Oboe 2.mp3
 
What's with this Capsule hate? It's like bumping to people telling how they REALLY HATE BLUE CARS.
 
Thankfully, I’ve come to realize our tastes are different enough to not worry about when they diverge. 🙂
I like the Legacy flute more, but the legacy English Horn sounds like a tone generator or something, definitely like Revive for a few of the instruments more, but NOT in the stock preset state they are in. There's a thick room tone/noise in the lower mids that has to go, and I first thought how I would EQ that out, then remembered Revive has more mic positions. I'm definitely going to play with that, maybe it's just the mic mix OT chose... Lord knows sample makers can put out some horrid presets, look at the Pop Preset in mostly all VSL Pianos... good night, that preset is like a piano landing on you with the first chord you play, lol. Call me stupid, but I want to see if Revive can be made to sound good with mic changes, although I can't do anything about the three weird notes in the Oboe, lol.

Thanks for the MID file Laurin!
 
What's with this Capsule hate? It's like bumping to people telling how they REALLY HATE BLUE CARS.
I hate the blue cars I can't see. I think it's more of a Kontakt problem, but for me the buttons and faders are just a bit too small to be comfortable with, so I prefer SINE. Same thing with Spitfire, really. Too much stuff in too little space, just like my home.
 
Oh, well- some of those CC-things and curves are a bit hard to see, but I've always taken it just as a minor annoyance myself. Takes a lot more than that for me to switch into SINE personally. :P

(No, I don't hate SINE. I just don't like it very much for various reasons, just like e.g. Spitfire's player.)
 
Do you recall the articulations used for the Clarinet and the tempo?

Here are flutes and oboes. All tree mic only.
Thanks for doing this!
The Clarinet plays at 90 bpm, everything else is at 120. The articulations for the Clarinet are (regular) Staccato and Portato short, the last note is a long Portato. The default mic setup in Kontakt for Revive is ORTF and TREE both at 0.0 dB btw., in case you want to replicate that :)
 
Thanks for doing this! I love comparisons like this. Of course a more upfront sound will be more appealing in a side by side comparison. The point of Revive was to get the winds to play nice with the rest of the orchestra, but they can still be brought forward:

Flute 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVRFL1L.mp3

Flute 1 Revive seems to have more body, which I don't hate. It makes it more intimate sounding. Notice also how much the quick turns and runs are improved compared to Legacy!
View attachment BWWLVRFL1R.mp3

Oboe 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVROB1L.mp3

Oboe 1 Revive. This one is missing a dynamic layer, which is unfortunate. That's one area where I wish they had beefed up Revive more.
View attachment BWWLVROB1R.mp3

Clarinet 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVRCL1L.mp3

Clarinet 1 Revive. This one is a bit iffy. I needed to shorten the note lengths because the sound was overlapping, and I'm not crazy about the sound of the Legacy OR Revive...more on that in a sec
View attachment BWWLVRCL1R.mp3

Clarinet 2 Revive. I'm including this because it sounds better than either of the two above, at least to me. The downside of Clarinet 2 Revive is that it's missing some articulations, but using the marcato articulation works really well.
View attachment BWWLVRCL2R.mp3


TO BE CONTINUED
 
Last edited:
The Sequel

English Horn 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVREH1L.mp3

English Horn 1 Revive. Notice how much better those crossfades are! Also I like the tone of Revive MUCH more, and it sounds like it has a wider dynamic range
View attachment BWWLVREH1R.mp3

Bassoon 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVRBSN1L.mp3

Bassoon 1 Revive
View attachment BWWLVRBSN2R.mp3

So overall they both sound great, but Revive is much more flexible because it can do the upfront soloist sound *and* the pushed back ensemble sound *and* there are more instruments and clearly the extra mics add a ton of flexibility. Plus I've also learned to love SINE more than Capsule.

And for anyone interested:

BWWLVRMics.jpg
 
Of course a more upfront sound will be more appealing in a side by side comparison. The point of Revive was to get the winds to play nice with the rest of the orchestra, but they can still be brought forward:
I think that getting the instruments to sit well in an orchestra and with minimal work is often ignored in these discussions, which tend to focus on a different type of playing. The lyricism of a soloist as such and the spot soloist in the orchestra will not be the same, even beyond issues of seating, and for support parts, soloists are often recorded in a way that it is hard to get them to recede into background. It’s one of the things I like about the SF Symphonic Woodwinds: they fit easily into an orchestral context, even instruments in the set I don’t especially like, such as the solo clarinet. The Revive Berlin instruments seem similar in that respect.

I only just got the Berlin main woodwinds and have not yet had an opportunity to give them even a cursory play though, much less seat them in an orchestra. The latter will be the real test for me. Is orchestral scoring easier or more difficult than with SSW? Are there compensating improvements in sound over SSW for any new difficulties Berlin Woodwinds introduce? In general I’ll say that this has been a mixed bag with Berlin Strings, which I love, but the main library remains slower to work with than other string libraries I have including many other OT string libraries. We’ll see but I’m looking forward to it.
 
The Sequel

English Horn 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVREH1L.mp3

English Horn 1 Revive. Notice how much better those crossfades are! Also I like the tone of Revive MUCH more, and it sounds like it has a wider dynamic range
View attachment BWWLVREH1R.mp3

Bassoon 1 Legacy
View attachment BWWLVRBSN1L.mp3

Bassoon 1 Revive
View attachment BWWLVRBSN2R.mp3

So overall they both sound great, but Revive is much more flexible because it can do the upfront soloist sound *and* the pushed back ensemble sound *and* there are more instruments and clearly the extra mics add a ton of flexibility. Plus I've also learned to love SINE more than Capsule.

And for anyone interested:

BWWLVRMics.jpg
Ye to me all the revive examples just sounds better; playability, consistency and tone and sample clarity.

I own none of these but always fun to look around and take a listen :)
 
How on earth can revive be more flexible with such fewer dynamics?
Flexibility depends on a lot of factors. And the context of sitting the instruments inside the orchestra also bears on this. Solo woodwinds seem to have a lot of tradeoffs for a variety of reasons, in some cases more so than solo strings, and solo strings don't have the issue of needing both to sit inside the orchestra as section players and then come forward for spot solos.
 
How on earth can revive be more flexible with such fewer dynamics?
It's probably my biggest criticism of Revive. That and the random missing articulations from the second clarinet. But just using my ears, the dynamics are weaker in the oboe and better in the English horn so I don't feel like Legacy is universally better.
 
Yeah, I’m sorry, dynamics are so very important. That’s why I dislike sample libraries. I needed to get a Tom part right for a scene and somehow (don't ask me how?) we ended up with Tom’s from Albion 2? I think and I kept trying to get a nice smooth rise in dynamics. But what was I thinking? I think they were only like two dynamic levels. I don't know what we ended up with but you can never have enough dynamics when you really need them. And no please just raising or lowering the volume is not the same. But you guys both have a great points.
 
Top Bottom