What's new

IK released Pianoverse piano virtual instrument

Arguably not a good decision heuristic because Craig's playing makes any piano library sound great. ;)
How right you are! :)
But that means the other way round. If the piano doesn't sound good under my hands, my skill at the piano is not good enough. ;) And that's true. :sad: I can't compete with Craig, he's in a different league.
 
Craig, classic pieces by you, is a new experience for me. Appreciate it very much. :thumbsup:

In the Chopin piece, I have the impression that the Boesendorfer sounds a little warmer than the VSL 280VC. Which is positive for classical pieces. But I have the impression that at one point or another, the sound decays too quickly. Am I wrong?

I had to grin at the excerpts from "Elise". You play the "Elise" and leave out the "difficult" ;) passage with the 32nd notes in measures 30-34. :)

Back to the point. The "Elise" shows well the dynamic range of the Boesendorfer.

In the "Arthur's Theme" example, I like the Boesendorfer best. The example alone is a reason for me to buy the Boesendorfer. Full resonant sound. :)

You didn't write anything about your personal impression. I suspect that it is not very different from the Yamaha CFIII.

Good work! Thank you! :emoji_clap:
Fine help here, while wrestling with Monthly subscrpt vs single Lib purchase. No 'right' answer, but now comfy with Bosendorfer, ahead of Yamaha. Will enjoy for sure. THX all ! 🙏🏻
 
I could no longer stand it so got a month trial. But instantly I was confronted with the annoyance and probably the most frustrating reasons why there is often a lot of negative comments around IKM.

I launched the installer and I was presented with 15 updates. So installed the binaries and then tried to install the updates of the sounds. But nope, you need to pay for updates if you bought it longer than half a year ago 😠

Then I added the serial I got from the subscription. Installing the binary was flawless, but installing the sound files.. nope. You cannot install it if you need the files to be on a different drive than your OS. Selection the options, choosing the install location will not fix it. It keeps popping the same error.

After fiddling around for a while, I managed to get the installer running by first manually adding a Pianoverse folder inside my IK Multimedia folder on the added drive, Then running Pianoverse and in the settings point the sound sources to the specified folder. After closing the app and relaunching the installer, it will then start the installation.

It is that I had to pay for this demo, else I would already have given up!
 

Attachments

  • Schermafbeelding 2023-10-07 om 18.21.19.png
    Schermafbeelding 2023-10-07 om 18.21.19.png
    29 KB · Views: 10
I could no longer stand it so got a month trial. But instantly I was confronted with the annoyance and probably the most frustrating reasons why there is often a lot of negative comments around IKM.

I launched the installer and I was presented with 15 updates. So installed the binaries and then tried to install the updates of the sounds. But nope, you need to pay for updates if you bought it longer than half a year ago 😠

Then I added the serial I got from the subscription. Installing the binary was flawless, but installing the sound files.. nope. You cannot install it if you need the files to be on a different drive than your OS. Selection the options, choosing the install location will not fix it. It keeps popping the same error.

After fiddling around for a while, I managed to get the installer running by first manually adding a Pianoverse folder inside my IK Multimedia folder on the added drive, Then running Pianoverse and in the settings point the sound sources to the specified folder. After closing the app and relaunching the installer, it will then start the installation.

It is that I had to pay for this demo, else I would already have given up!
Other than the bandwidth issues that IKM was having, my installs went very smoothly. I'm not certain why everyone is having all these problems!

As I said above, I have lots of IKM plugins, and I have had zero issues with installing any of them.
 
I launched the installer and I was presented with 15 updates. So installed the binaries and then tried to install the updates of the sounds. But nope, you need to pay for updates if you bought it longer than half a year ago 😠
:thumbsdown:

Then I added the serial I got from the subscription. Installing the binary was flawless, but installing the sound files.. nope. You cannot install it if you need the files to be on a different drive than your OS. Selection the options, choosing the install location will not fix it. It keeps popping the same error.


After fiddling around for a while, I managed to get the installer running by first manually adding a Pianoverse folder inside my IK Multimedia folder on the added drive, Then running Pianoverse and in the settings point the sound sources to the specified folder. After closing the app and relaunching the installer, it will then start the installation.
When I wanted to install the Boesendorfer, the Product Manager also downloaded and installed the CF3 that had already been installed 2 days ago. Very annoying. :sad:

It is that I had to pay for this demo, else I would already have given up!
I hope you like one or two of the pianos, so that it was worth the effort.
 
Other than the bandwidth issues that IKM was having, my installs went very smoothly. I'm not certain why everyone is having all these problems!

As I said above, I have lots of IKM plugins, and I have had zero issues with installing any of them.
Do you use Windows or Mac? Under Windows there are often different issues depending on hardware, drivers, configuration or other installed programmes and tools. By the way, such different behaviours are also known for mobile phones, smart TV, games, etc. Software is always buggy, but the bugs do not occur for everyone.
 
Do you use Windows or Mac? Under Windows there are often different issues depending on hardware, drivers, configuration or other installed programmes and tools. By the way, such different behaviours are also known for mobile phones, smart TV, games, etc. Software is always buggy, but the bugs do not occur for everyone.
Smooth sailing on Windows 10 over here. Mac is usually much more bug-free than Windows.
 
I had my 1st spin with the CFIII, using my Roland RD700NX (PHA III Ivory feel keyboard) and the raw sound is absolutely gorgeous! It sounds really nice! But while playing it didn't feel as dynamic as Ivory, Keyscape or VSL. I also heard some significant timbre shifts and volume jumps while trying to play as dynamically possible.

So I created a MIDI track which ramps from velocity 1 to 127 in +1 steps. You can then step through the dynamic layers with the arrow keys in Studio one. And what I was hearing in the playing was abundantly clear when going from note to note.

There are 11 very noticeable volume and timbre switches if you do this. I repeated this exercise with some random other keys. And the exact same changes where on exactly the same volumes. I can clearly hear 11 of these dynamic and timbre switches on the close mic, indicating 12 dynamic layers.

1-5, 10, 30, 40, 60, 69, 77, 85, 93, 103, 123-127

So I became curious to the content of the samples folders. There are 3 folders for each piano: Notes, releases and pedal sounds. In Notes and releases there are 12 folders per mic. This combined with my findings above strongly indicates that it's a 12 velocity sampled instrument and not 14 to 20.

Another thing I ran into is that I am not able to find how to mix the 2 mics. When I asked this on a forum (not sure it was VI) a user replied that you can mix the two mics. But so far I have only been able to switch them and not blend them.
 
… So I created a MIDI track which ramps from velocity 1 to 127 in +1 steps. You can then step through the dynamic layers with the arrow keys in Studio one. And what I was hearing in the playing was abundantly clear when going from note to note.

There are 11 very noticeable volume and timbre switches if you do this. I repeated this exercise with some random other keys. And the exact same changes where on exactly the same volumes. I can clearly hear 11 of these dynamic and timbre switches on the close mic, indicating 12 dynamic layers.

1-5, 10, 30, 40, 60, 69, 77, 85, 93, 103, 123-127

So I became curious to the content of the samples folders. There are 3 folders for each piano: Notes, releases and pedal sounds. In Notes and releases there are 12 folders per mic. This combined with my findings above strongly indicates that it's a 12 velocity sampled instrument and not 14 to 20. …
Good approach and interesting finding. The Boesendorfer also has only 12 folders. Hmm? 🤔

… Another thing I ran into is that I am not able to find how to mix the 2 mics. When I asked this on a forum (not sure it was VI) a user replied that you can mix the two mics. But so far I have only been able to switch them and not blend them.
Mixing the two microphone perspectives is not possible from my point of view. You have to use a second VST if you want to do that.

I had my 1st spin with the CFIII, using my Roland RD700NX (PHA III Ivory feel keyboard) and the raw sound is absolutely gorgeous! It sounds really nice! But while playing it didn't feel as dynamic as Ivory, Keyscape or VSL. I also heard some significant timbre shifts and volume jumps while trying to play as dynamically possible. …
You may be right. But, none of the companies mentioned offer a Yamaha CFIII VI and their prices are not negligible either. I am also happy to have a decent CFIII in my collection. I also have all the VSL pianos, including the 3 Boesendorfer Grands, but the IKM Boesendorfer is also a nice alternative. Yes, they have weaknesses, like the una corda, no velocity editor or the sympathetic resonance, but for the price, the IKM pianos are a no-brainer for me.
 
Last edited:
Checked out the Upright Y5. Same 12 velocity layers, but at different switch points. And on one of the switch points it gets more quiet instead of louder.

But... The sound is phenomenal! The attack of the keys and the staccato I really dig. The number of velocity layers is not all that counts for the overal image (depending on the music obviously). I was actually waiting for a sale on the Ivory Upright pianos to get their U5, but I might just go with this one.

Too bad I cannot test drive against the Ivory to see how it stacks up.

I added a MIDI of the velocity ramp I did, if anyone is interested to check velocities of a VI.
 

Attachments

  • Velocity ramp.mid
    1 KB · Views: 6

But... The sound is phenomenal! The attack of the keys and the staccato I really dig. The number of velocity layers is not all that counts for the overal image (depending on the music obviously). I was actually waiting for a sale on the Ivory Upright pianos to get their U5, but I might just go with this one.
Such information makes me happy. You rarely read anything about the IKM U5 here on the forum.
Here's a tip: check out the Yamaha C6 and UX in the “Hammers & Waves Acoustics“ bundle.

C6 + UX samples
 
Last edited:
So I wrapped up my 1st round of testing and playing with the Pianoverse Steinway and Bosendorfer models. Also these 2 models are unmistakably 12 dynamic layers. These two are definitely my least favorites out of the bundle.

I'm a huge fan of the New York Steinway, but this one is not for me. Some might call it warm, but to me it's muddy and lacks the treble I expect from a Steinway. Compared to the VSL it sure has a lot of low-end and body, but it misses clarity. If I EQ a bit of 250 cycles out it becomes a bit better, but I have a hard time to really make it sound good to my taste. At the high dynamics it starts to sound great but then you're also out of dynamic layers :sad:

It also feels very uneven to me, and E5 sounds completely filtered when played at low and medium velocity. If you play at very low velocities, all you hear is some low percussive sounds instead of a piano tone. It stays that way even if I remove all the key noises. Might be the model they sampled though.

I can imagine some people might really like it for cinematic and very intimate stuff, as at low velocities it almost sounds like a felt piano to me.

The Bosendorfer sounds good, as we all have been able to hear from the demos from @CGR though I already fell in love the the Tube mic on the VSL. The B280 has a bit more warmth in the lows, the VSL more presence in the upper registers and also a bit more clarity in my opinion. Though at it's price point, the Pianoverse Bosendorfer is a hell of a deal compared to the VSL 280VC full edition (needed to get access to that Tube mic).

I do not get though that IKM did not want to tell us that they sampled 12 dynamic layers. Alicia's keys has 12 layers, AcousticSamples C7 has 9 layers and they both are deemed very good. There's more to a realistic piano sound than the dynamic layers which you can mask in a production with a bit of editing (in a lot of cases).

I also do not get why they chose to make the mic's switchable instead of blend-able.

What's unique is the extreme dry recordings. The tone, note attack and releases are really good. The way they added the effects and generative reverb is a nice bonus for creativity. Although you can not blend the mics, it does give you an additional color.

It's highly likely that I will pick up the Yamaha U5 (Royal Upright Y5) and maybe the CFIII.
 
… I'm a huge fan of the New York Steinway, but this one is not for me. Some might call it warm, but to me it's muddy and lacks the treble I expect from a Steinway. Compared to the VSL it sure has a lot of low-end and body, but it misses clarity. If I EQ a bit of 250 cycles out it becomes a bit better, but I have a hard time to really make it sound good to my taste. At the high dynamics it starts to sound great but then you're also out of dynamic layers :sad:

It also feels very uneven to me, and E5 sounds completely filtered when played at low and medium velocity. If you play at very low velocities, all you hear is some low percussive sounds instead of a piano tone. It stays that way even if I remove all the key noises. Might be the model they sampled though.
Thank you for this information. The NY Steinway and the upcoming Hamburger had the least appeal for me because I have 18 Steinway Ds in my collection.

I can imagine some people might really like it for cinematic and very intimate stuff, as at low velocities it almost sounds like a felt piano to me.
It's not for me either. I bought some (5-6) of these much praised "Intimate" Pianos, but have uninstalled them all. The Piano VIs are undoubtedly good, but I don't like the muddy/felted sound. I am probably too much of a purist in that aspect.

The Bosendorfer sounds good, as we all have been able to hear from the demos from @CGR though I already fell in love the the Tube mic on the VSL. The B280 has a bit more warmth in the lows, the VSL more presence in the upper registers and also a bit more clarity in my opinion. Though at it's price point, the Pianoverse Bosendorfer is a hell of a deal compared to the VSL 280VC full edition (needed to get access to that Tube mic).

+1

I do not get though that IKM did not want to tell us that they sampled 12 dynamic layers. Alicia's keys has 12 layers, AcousticSamples C7 has 9 layers and they both are deemed very good. There's more to a realistic piano sound than the dynamic layers which you can mask in a production with a bit of editing (in a lot of cases).

+1

… I also do not get why they chose to make the mic's switchable instead of blend-able.

CPU load? Phasing issues? 🤔

It's highly likely that I will pick up the Yamaha U5 (Royal Upright Y5) and maybe the CFIII.
:thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Smooth sailing on Windows 10 over here. Mac is usually much more bug-free than Windows.
On Windows 10: What do you say to that? As you can see, my two pianos are displayed correctly here. But, since I installed both pianos, the left authorizations display is wrong with 9. It should only be 8. Or not? OK, it's not that important.

1696757765024.png

And here, what's going on? No "Black Diamond B280" but instead the "Royal Upright Y5". And, I have tried it out, it is not a spelling mistake. Maybe I don't understand how the Product Manager works and it's all OK. For me, it's a bug!

1696757875121.png
 
On Windows 10: What do you say to that? As you can see, my two pianos are displayed correctly here. But, since I installed both pianos, the left authorizations display is wrong with 9. It should only be 8. Or not? OK, it's not that important.

1696757765024.png

And here, what's going on? No "Black Diamond B280" but instead the "Royal Upright Y5". And, I have tried it out, it is not a spelling mistake. Maybe I don't understand how the Product Manager works and it's all OK. For me, it's a bug!

1696757875121.png
Re: the authorizations - I believe that is for the main Pianoverse software, not the individual pianos, so 9 is correct. I have all 4 current pianos installed, and mine shows 9 left.

Re: the missing Bosie - Try looking under the main "Sounds" tab at the top of the UI instead of the "Sounds" tab under Pianoverse. This same thing happened to me with only two showing in the latter location, but they all were shown & installable under the main "Sounds" tab.
 
...

Re: the missing Bosie - Try looking under the main "Sounds" tab at the top of the UI instead of the "Sounds" tab under Pianoverse. This same thing happened to me with only two showing in the latter location, but they all were shown & installable under the main "Sounds" tab.
:thumbsup: Thank you! I had found that out myself. But the behaviour of the IKM Product Manager is "weird" for new IKM customers like me.
 
I really like Pianoverse, and it's a valuable addition to my collection of Piano VIs. I llke the sound and found all the pianos usuable. For me the dry recording is a huge plus. Imho it's definately up there in the top Tier, with Garritan CFX, Noire, Ravenscroft etc.

I'd like to see sympathetic resonance in future versions, IK is pretty good at modelling so that would be a nice addition.

Is there a way to adjust the dynamic response (i.e. the difference of volume between the loudest and softest sound) of the model in the way Pianoteq does?

@IKMultimedia Any chance you can provide/create a dedicated Kawai VPC1 veiocity curve (in VPC1 format) that matches Pianoverse? There are lots of VPC1 owners like me that would surely want to use an official curve, given the level of attention of Pianoverse on ultra-precise sampling.
 
I really like Pianoverse, and it's a valuable addition to my collection of Piano VIs. I llke the sound and found all the pianos usuable. For me the dry recording is a huge plus. Imho it's definately up there in the top Tier, with Garritan CFX, Noire, Ravenscroft etc.
Yes, the IKM pianos are good, but for me not on Garritan CFX level. Not even close, from the point of view as a solo player.

I'd like to see sympathetic resonance in future versions, IK is pretty good at modelling so that would be a nice addition.
I fully agree with you.

Is there a way to adjust the dynamic response (i.e. the difference of volume between the loudest and softest sound) of the model in the way Pianoteq does?
...
I don't miss it, but I haven't seen any option.
 
Last edited:
Yes, the IKM pianos are good, but for me not on Garritan CFX level. Not even close, from the point of view as a solo player.
I wouldn't view it as a replacement but complementary. If there was a CFX in Pianoverse we could directly compare but I do not have the experience to understand which parts of the sound are due to the sampling and which due to the piano itself. The bass register on the Garritan is jaw dropping and the VI is a gold standard, period. Personally I switched to Noire from Garritan as my goto because I tend to find the Garritan a bit sterile but that's just me.
 
… If there was a CFX in Pianoverse we could directly compare but I do not have the experience to understand which parts of the sound are due to the sampling and which due to the piano itself.
Hmm? Now here I am a bit confused because I don't understand your question. 🤔

Please don't misunderstand the following, I don't want to be a smart-ass. I write the following so that you understand why I do not understand what you mean.

Mics are attached to the real piano, then a key is struck at a certain velocity and the sound is recorded. This is done over the entire keyboard and at different velocity levels. The number of velocity levels chosen are called layers. Usually the notes are recorded with sustain pedal up and down (sympathetic resonance). In addition, for each key the sound is recorded when the key is released. In addition, keys and pedal noises can also be recorded. All this can also be done for the una corda pedal. Then you have many, up to several 10000 key recordings, which are the samples of the instrument. Simply put, the samples are an electronic copy of a real instrument. However, piano VIs can only reproduce an acoustic piano to a limited extent. Sadly … 😢
There are even piano VIs that consist only of samples. That is, they do not contain any additional programming (script).
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom