What's new

Introducing Pēteris Vasks Strings - available now at an intro price of 449 + VAT (regular 549)

Still can't believe how amazing this library is. It allows me to write things I couldn't do before. Hoping to see more of that beautiful, lyrical stuff as well with other instruments in the same-ish space (soft lyrical woodwinds / brass?) Definitely a game changer amd unique library for me.
 
Still can't believe how amazing this library is. It allows me to write things I couldn't do before. Hoping to see more of that beautiful, lyrical stuff as well with other instruments in the same-ish space (soft lyrical woodwinds / brass?) Definitely a game changer amd unique library for me.
Agree. It’s a phenomenal library with a lot more expressive range than is evident in the walkthrough or demos.
 
Still can't believe how amazing this library is. It allows me to write things I couldn't do before. Hoping to see more of that beautiful, lyrical stuff as well with other instruments in the same-ish space (soft lyrical woodwinds / brass?) Definitely a game changer amd unique library for me.
Right! I keep thinking about this library too… Hoping OT will release more impressive stuff like this in the future.
I'm wondering if this would only be attainable with soft-sounding instruments though? To me, those legatos are something else! Is it just me or do they sound more realistic than a lot of other strings libraries? Is it because of the lush quiet nature, or could they do the same with louder "general" sounding strings?
 
Right! I keep thinking about this library too… Hoping OT will release more impressive stuff like this in the future.
I'm wondering if this would only be attainable with soft-sounding instruments though? To me, those legatos are something else! Is it just me or do they sound more realistic than a lot of other strings libraries? Is it because of the lush quiet nature, or could they do the same with louder "general" sounding strings?
Its focus is soft playing, which is not the dynamic focus of most libraries. But it can still do a credible robust forte when needed. And for a chamber string library that covers a lot of ground that you’d want to use a chamber string group to cover. It has a particular bent—the aesthetic follows from Vasks’ first symphony—but they’ve done an excellent job of generalizing that so the sound coheres but doesn’t feel overly restrictive. Listening to the demos you might think its expressive range is narrow and quite niche, but that’s not really the case. The Vask aesthetic does extend over the whole library but that serves more as glue to hold the library and its various articulations together—it ensures a kind of background coherence to the sounds—but it does not feel like a restriction in use, other than how any sample library comes with certain limitations.

As for complementary brass and wind libraries, I’ve had decent luck with most everything I’ve tried. The main thing has been to use chamber sized complements: 1-2 brass players per section, 1-2 winds per section. I very much like winds in pairs, 2 horns, 2 trumpets, 1 trombone, 1 tuba, timp, harp, and one percussionist as a chamber orchestra for PVS. The other thing is to write for chamber orchestra and don’t expect epic cinematic from it.

I’ll add that the first chairs are also very nice instruments. They are designed as first chairs and spot soloists from within the orchestral but they also can serve as chamber players, though the seams between the articulations and dynamic layers require management. (Layers here is misleading because the legatos and sustains for the first chairs are treated as separate articulations rather than dynamic layer crossfades. That means it can sometimes be tricky to move smoothly from one legato sustain to the next if you want to change dynamic levels and of course there’s no internal morphing of one layer to the next on a single sustain.) So long as you compose with that sort of limitation in mind, it’s not really a problem and in the context of first chairs of the sections, the way the section legatos and sustains are treated generally masks these seams in that context.
 
I love PVS. I use the first chairs a lot. I love their tone. The ensembles are a bit more hit and miss for me. I don't know why but sometimes, for some compositions, they sound amazing, and other times, they sound a bit fizzy/synthy to me. It's probably my lack of experience. But when they work, they really work.
 
I thought it got enormous praise from virtually everyone! Such a great sound
I don’t think there have been all that many user demos posted after the initial flurry at release. And comparatively there weren’t even that many during the release period. And this is not just the case with PVS. It seems like there are fewer user demos of most libraries than there once were.
 
One of the most used libraries in my arsenal. Especially the first chairs.
There's a sense in which I'm so completely enthralled by just the first chairs - and even just the soft sul tasto and lyrical articulations at that - that it's really slowed me from getting more stuck into the rest of the library.

There are libraries I love as much as PVS (Tallin, Tundra, OACE, SSW), but nothing I love more.
 
Last edited:
Very minimal noodle (very minimal) that uses just a touch of the 1st chairs (with an even smaller touch of the Salu Cello), yet for all that you can just about count the number of actual notes used on your fingers, I think it shows a glimpse something right at the heart of the musicality of this library.

View attachment q35 - micro - puffin med 3 - 2023-05-26, 11.18 PM 1.mp3
I remember this track selling me on the 1st Chairs instantly on release, and I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve listened to it since.

Such a lovely piece :inlove:
 
PVS instantly became one of my favorites and absolute desert island material. The first chairs sound like no other library, I use them so much because of their musicality. And they are pretty versatile, from sul tasto to expressive, from close to far mic positions, I reach a lot for them. I'm pretty sure they are in every track I made since they came out, in one way or another. I have a day job though, so take it with a grain of salt ;)
 
One of the most used libraries in my arsenal. Especially the first chairs.
Do you think the room noise is more controlled than something like Tallinn (if you own that)? I love the sound of the strings in Tallinn, but they are just not usable to me because of the baked in room noise. There was a comment that said they sounded like a fan was on in the back on every release tail, and that perfectly describes the issue I have. Does PVS have a similar issue?
 
Do you think the room noise is more controlled than something like Tallinn (if you own that)? I love the sound of the strings in Tallinn, but they are just not usable to me because of the baked in room noise. There was a comment that said they sounded like a fan was on in the back on every release tail, and that perfectly describes the issue I have. Does PVS have a similar issue?
Vasks, is an amazing library, that really breathes life into music, and it has sounds I cannot get from other libraries, like the really quiet stuff. It just sounds very unique. I used it a lot, especially the solo instruments. Of course with very quiet sampling there is always an issue with noise floor. But in the mix it is not a problem. It is only an issue when you want to make a really quiet instrument cut through a mix, which is not intended to be done - meaning when you raise to much the volume of a quiet sample, which inevitably will also raise the sound of the noise floor. Hope this helps. All in all, I use Vasks lib a lot, and recommend it.
 
Top Bottom