What's new

I'm building Wavekit an audio hosting service

I've definitely considered something like this. It's an ubiquitous UI idiom of websites selling plugin effects. I hadn't considered it for mixing and mastering pros though.

It would be a super cool feature but right now I'm focusing on high-priority critical stuff.

I do have a couple of ideas on how to implement this AB player though. If I ever get to it, would it be ok to contact you privately to get some feedback?
Some ideas on this from an outside perspective, if you don't mind.

This could be implemented as a concept that wraps the player. On my site I made a wrapping concept called Stage (yeah, the player is on a stage 😄), and provides extra functionality that wouldn't naturally belong in the player. In my case, I experimented with changing the surrounding layout and starting a video, when the player was started by the user. Here's an example, I even considered changing the css of my site to something more dark, as it is a moody track. (It's all just an experiment...)

Continuing this concept further, you could easily provide future pre-made Stages for users to copy and paste (and let them code their own if so inclined), such as:

* Video Background Stage
* Image Ken Burns Stage
* Full Screen Stage
* A/B Test Stage
* ...

To implement this, you could base it on a (new) official public API made up of a few public functions such as Start([from]), Stop() and a few public evens such as Started(startedAt), Stopped(stoppedAt), Ended (when the player reaches the end of sound file).

The positives would be that it would incur limited new complexity in the player, start a solid public frontend API and a new concept that is open to extension if new needs arise.

You could make a separate page that is a "Stage builder". User opens context menu on a given Audio in the admin, clicks "Add to Stage", which could open the Stage builder. User chooses what stage and copies the code.

Aaaaanyway, just some ideas... :D
 
I am trying this out and so far, I am really impressed. Super easy and I think I am hearing better audio quality than SoundCloud.
Thanks!

SoundCloud streams at 128kbps. We stream at 320kbps.

We encode with LAME which is considered the best MP3 encoder as far as audio fidelity goes. It's a bit slower than other encoders but it's worth it. I also set up a fleet of servers to be able to encode multiple files at the same time to account for this.
 
Thanks!

SoundCloud streams at 128kbps. We stream at 320kbps.

We encode with LAME which is considered the best MP3 encoder as far as audio fidelity goes. It's a bit slower than other encoders but it's worth it. I also set up a fleet of servers to be able to encode multiple files at the same time to account for this.
This paragraph could / should be super obvious on your marketing page.

Now it says, “We stream crystal clear audio”

That rolls off me like water on a duck.

This hits me: “
SoundCloud streams at 128kbps. We stream at 320kbps.

I also like this even if it could be shorter:

We encode with LAME which is considered the best MP3 encoder as far as audio fidelity goes. It's a bit slower than other encoders but it's worth it. I also set up a fleet of servers to be able to encode multiple files at the same time to account for this.
 
@Soundbed

There's an article in the blog which goes into a lot more detail comparing the services.

Thanks for the feedback though. This means I need to make this info much easier to find.

1702065750496.png
 
Last edited:
@Soundbed

There's an article in the blog which goes into a lot more detail comparing the services.


Thanks for the feedback though. This means I need to make this info much easier to find.

1702065750496.png
Yeah I mean literally

SoundCloud streams at 128kbps. We stream at 320kbps.

With those literal words you will have sales.

I guarantee it.

Well I cannot guarantee it. But whatever’s close to me guaranteeing it.

Big letters.
 
Isn't it common knownledge that the audio quality on SoundCloud is bad?

At least among professionals. Not your nephew-turned-trap-producer who wants to share audio with their friends.
 
Isn't it common knownledge that the audio quality on SoundCloud is bad?

At least among professionals. Not your nephew-turned-trap-producer who wants to share audio with their friends.
Yes, that may be common knowledge (among professionals), but when you say "We stream crystal clear audio” on your webpage, that can easily be interpreted as meaningless (or vague) marketing speak (by professionals and hobbyist alike). When you say, "SoundCloud streams at 128kbps. We stream at 320kbps," or some version of that, it is a "crystal clear" (and concrete) way of saying "We stream crystal clear audio."
 
Isn't it common knownledge that the audio quality on SoundCloud is bad?

At least among professionals. Not your nephew-turned-trap-producer who wants to share audio with their friends.
Yes and when people are looking for an alternative they want to know your competitive advantage.

I forgot SoundCloud was 128, so I get the added reminder of how bad it is, and seeing that you’re at 320 makes me feel like I want your product even more.

The measurements are what make a difference. Not just crystal-clear — actually 320 versus 128.

We live in a world where measurable outcomes and numbers are rather influential.
 
but when you say "We stream crystal clear audio” on your webpage, that can easily be interpreted as meaningless (or vague) marketing speak
I agree 100% :)

Which is why just below that marketing-speak there's some actual data:

1702067363040.png

The mobile version doesn't show this yet.

Still working on this thing! 😅
 
I agree 100% :)

Which is why just below that marketing-speak there's some actual data:

1702067363040.png

The mobile version doesn't show this yet.

Still working on this thing! 😅
idea:

Make the white box SoundCloud orange and change the label to “YourCloud” or “SoundHost” or something cheeky.
 
Hey, I think I saw a possibility to subscribe for your service earlier but I can't see it anymore. I'd like to try it out at some point- should I apply for beta via email or how does the system work for now?
 
Hey, I think I saw a possibility to subscribe for your service earlier but I can't see it anymore. I'd like to try it out at some point- should I apply for beta via email or how does the system work for now?
Send me a private message with your email address and I'll hook you up!
 
Last edited:
Hi Pier, I would be interested in seeing how this stacks up in relation to the Soundcloud Pro user account’s features. For the platform I am developing I also think that streaming quality is important…
 
PLEASE have a dark-mode for your site, as I really hate looking at white backgrounds.
Yes, definitely. This will be the last thing to add though to the marketing website.

Of course our player can already adapt to both light and dark themes. Either using a setting of the player or automatically to whatever the OS is using.
 
Top Bottom