@samphony you can copy/paste events and markers etc. from Logic's event list into a spreadsheet. just select all the events you need. what you paste is delimited by tabs.
I tried it back then and it didn’t work. Good to know that it works now!
@samphony you can copy/paste events and markers etc. from Logic's event list into a spreadsheet. just select all the events you need. what you paste is delimited by tabs.
I'd be curious to know why you think that's for the better.
Egads those white Windows 98 style windows, horror...
Egads those white Windows 98 style windows, horror...
recently smitten with Reaper.
and i've owned it for years.
Reaticulate will be my final frontier - i think i have it installed correctly.
just trying to figure out how to show the patch change lane it uses for each channel.
i'm not anyway. but i'm also not the guys who asks the fans how much they like their club. what I offer is designed for the target group of VI control and i'd like to know how many here use Reaper as their DAW. because Cubase and Logic I have already covered. you're right, i'm funnelling things down a lot - on purpose.
i've found a single Reaticulate thread on the reaper forum which is there since 2 years and has about 400 post, if that's all it is, well ...
You cannot convert or share Art Conductor content, as stated in the EULA.Couple questions regarding Art Conductor licensing:
- Are owners of Art Conductor permitted to convert these libraries to .reabanks for personal use?
- If owners of Art Conductors are permitted to convert these libraries to .reabanks, are they allowed to share them?
Then, of course, it begs the question of whether you've reconsidered the idea of building your own set. Considering that both Reaper and Reaticulate (including OTR) have become more popular since the previous time, and there is a tool available that would make it easier for you to create a set. Thank you.You cannot convert or share Art Conductor content, as stated in the EULA.
A couple of years back some people ask similar questions and it turned out that Reaper user would like native Art Conductor sets but didn’t like the idea of paying for those. That’s the reason why we never started working on those. I wonder if things have changed?Then, of course, it begs the question of whether you've reconsidered the idea of building your own set
I think most Reaper users are just fine with Reaticulate.A couple of years back some people ask similar questions and it turned out that Reaper user would like native Art Conductor sets but didn’t like the idea of paying for those. That’s the reason why we never started working on those. I wonder if things have changed?
I personally would pay for it. I would probably buy your existing set as well, if it was okay to unofficially convert it for my own use afterwards. Of course, I only speak for myself and I don't know to what extent the community around Reaper is locked in the open source mentality.A couple of years back some people ask similar questions and it turned out that Reaper user would like native Art Conductor sets but didn’t like the idea of paying for those. That’s the reason why we never started working on those. I wonder if things have changed?
Same... as an owner of numerous 8Dio, NI, VSL libraries, Art Conductor saves me a ton of time and that is worth the price. I program 9-12 hours a day... not trying to spend even more hours writing articulations and organizing them especially when it is already done for a modest amount.I personally would pay for it. I would probably buy your existing set as well, if it was okay to unofficially convert it for my own use afterwards. Of course, I only speak for myself and I don't know to what extent the community around Reaper is locked in the open source mentality.
?I think most Reaper users are just fine with Reaticulate.
I assume you've heard of Reaticulate?Same... as an owner of numerous 8Dio, NI, VSL libraries, Art Conductor saves me a ton of time and that is worth the price. I program 9-12 hours a day... not trying to spend even more hours writing articulations and organizing them especially when it is already done for a modest amount.
?
I'm not sure this is an accurate characterization of Reaper users. I think the attitude is simply why pay for 3rd party software when the community built version works just fine? I think if Reaper users didn't have a solution to the articulation problem, most would gladly pay for it.I personally would be happy to purchase articulation sets. There can be kind of a weird thing among reaper users, that somehow paying money for goods and services within reaper is not in the spirit of reaper. I know that at least some of us would gladly pay though. Have you posted in the thread on the reaper forum? Probably get a good idea over there
?I'm not sure this is an accurate characterization of Reaper users. I think the attitude is simply why pay for 3rd party software when the community built version works just fine? I think if Reaper users didn't have a solution to the articulation problem, most would gladly pay for it.