I was wondering something along the same lines myself. If you're supposed to mix into it, how can you tell whether it is improving things or not? Or is it supposed to be a sort of mixing guide as well as automatic mastererer?1. Slap a stock EQ into the master bus with a hyped Fletcher-Munson curve.
2. Mix into that.
3. When done mixing, remove the EQ.
4. Realize that the stock EQ is now "the essential plugin to make everything sound better".
Just saying. :D
Up to 8x oversampling in the latest update, and it doesn't sound like his Ozone 4 preset.In the end, you can choose to engage a relatively cheap limiter which wasn't doing any proper oversampling the last time I looked at it with PluginDoctor.
It's a close copy of the old Jaycen's Ozone 4 preset made into a plugin, I think.
This plugin out of the box does something like a 3dB high shelf at 150 Hz and a -3dB low shelf at about 2.6 kHz. Then, it does a bit of multiband compression (close to the Pro-MB 'level and punch' preset.) It then adds some odd harmonics, and finally completely fucks up your stereo image (if you are mixing something for a film, don't use it.) In the end, you can choose to engage a relatively cheap limiter which wasn't doing any proper oversampling the last time I looked at it with PluginDoctor.
It's a close copy of the old Jaycen's Ozone 4 preset made into a plugin, I think.
2probeats Youtube has a free Ozone 9 preset (I believe it works in 9 and possibly 8 and 7). You can tweak that and my feeling is that I have far more control with it. I did an A - B of my tweaks of the preset and there's no appreciable difference in quality at least for me - both are effective at adding harmonic excitement and stereo width, and balancing the multibands of the compression. I didn't add a limiter on it, but that would be next I suppose. Also I haven't yet placed it, or Ozone 9, in DDMF Metaplugin which will allow a degree of oversampling, which should improve it further. I have a friend who's trying this preset with an earlier free version of Ozone, so it may or may not work in that but it should.
I see why people like it. Its not just that Ozone is a bit hard to face, with all its technicalities. But more than that there are occasions where the multiband EQ setup in God Particle may be a zero-effort deal, whereas people will probably overthink curves and eq (God Particle has a particular knob response curve for the low, mid, high that's covered in a video by Panorama Mixing & Mastering (Youtube).
Another route to trying to add "sauce" and streamline one's dynamics, EQ and spatial balancing, is to get a few of the Hornet plugins, like Hornet ThirtyOne Mk2 (amazing, and on sale for less than $10 usually - currently about $5), Analog Mk4, and Syncpressor - these are always going on sale and can be interesting at cheaply accomplishing things otherwise a bit more expensive to accomplish.
There are a lot of routes to get a lot of things, but for simplicity, God Particle seems to do a good job at replacing multiple plugins.
One thing I've never been able to replace is my DDMF Magic Death Eye Stereo Compressor - even on the chain A-B'ing the trial of God Particle with Ozone 9, my ears always preferred it left on (as was true of Syncpressor & Analog Mk2 but especially Hornet ThirtyOne Mk2).
I'm not opting to buy God Particle because Ozone 9 did too good a job here. But also I have so many alternatives to improve or vary God Particle's sound that would cost a beginner in time to learn. The Ozone 9 preset is free (just provide an email, and I used a spam account that I check irregularly, and never had to even "activate" it). See the comments below the video.
Bought. How can I not after reading @KEM 's passionate recommendation!
My mixes definitely can use some divine intervention.
So really it is a "mixing assistant" plugin rather than a mastering plugin?3) It's not meant to be a last-minute bandaid for a lacking mix, so demoing it as such won't give you the best impression. Mix into it from the start and be aware of how/where to hit the meters.
But this would be true of pretty much any random mixbus chain.Put it on your mixbus before you even start mixing and then go from there, and once you feel like you’ve got a finished mix go ahead and turn it off and see how much of a different it makes
Can repost and MATCH the volume levels (version 'on' is much louder and can influence decisions) I think with same same volume comparisons it will sound better - more 'open' even.I don't really know if it's doing anything crazy that ozone can't do, but I bought I bought it anyway a couple days ago and I love it, I'm not great at this stuff so it definitely simplifies some of the process
off:
View attachment kwolok no particle.mp3
on (overkill but was having fun using it):
View attachment kwolok particle.mp3
So really it is a "mixing assistant" plugin rather than a mastering plugin?
But this would be true of pretty much any random mixbus chain.
Ah ok, thank you! This makes a bit more sense. But if I'm getting it mastered afterwards then I definitely don't want a limiter in the chain, right? (And possibly not much — if any — compression, depending on the engineer's tastes.)It’s not a mastering plugin at all, I think that’s where people get it confused, it’s Jaycen Joshua’s mixbus in a plugin. This plugin is meant to replace your entire mixbus chain, then you would master it afterwards
Ah ok, thank you! This makes a bit more sense. But if I'm getting it mastered afterwards then I definitely don't want a limiter in the chain, right? (And possibly not much — if any — compression, depending on the engineer's tastes.)