What's new

Dante

dgburns

software surfer
Just to derail the thread slightly, a couple of questions about your dual-machine, all-Dante setup - since I am considering moving to Dante:

• Do you use Dante Virtual Soundcard on either (or both) machines, or do you have actual Thunderbolt/USB > Dante interfaces (RME DigiFace Dante, Focusrite PCIeNX, DAD, etc.) on either or both?

• If you've used both DVS and hardware Dante interfaces, have you found any differences in CPU load or latency between the two methods?

• In general with Dante, do you find that you can use small buffers (32 or 64) and achieve latencies that are acceptable for playing software-synth percussion, tracking guitars, etc.?

• Do you use a router/switch for all the Dante Cat5 cabling, and if so... which one? Managed or un-managed? (I just got a headache typing that phrase out...)

I like the idea of the flexibility that a Dante system could provide but I've never sat in front of one and am concerned that some aspect of the system would present a hard lower limit on the total system delay between "hit a finger-drumming pad" and "kick sample hits my ears". This becomes even more of a concern as I consider adding a Trinnov Nova to the signal path.... and it's still hard for an old guy like me to wrap my brain around the idea that AoIP can get shove packets around the room as quickly as "linear / continuous / direct" MADI or Thunderbolt data streams.

One idea might be to adopt a hybrid approach, where the primary interface for Logic is connected via Thunderbolt / USB - like a DAD ThunderCore 256, AX Center, or AX64, which all have Dante ports - and Dante is then used to bridge audio from that interface into the Dante network, allowing stuff like more analog I/O and Trinnov Nova to dangle from the end of Cat5 cabling.... but I'm still unsure if such routing is possible or practical, or if I'm just complicating things.

The minimal hardware method would be to use Dante Virtual Soundcard on all three of my machines and just plug a FerroFish Dante <> analog box and the Trinnov Nova into the network, but the DVS limit of 64 I/O might be a limit, so... interested to hear your experiences with Dante.

Ok, This post is for @charlieclouser - I'll take it out of the other thread out of respect for the thread poster. Lemme try and run through.

MacPro Daw machine:
-Focusrite pcie card - this is the main core audio sound card. Solid so far.
-to-
-Focusrite Rednet 2 ( maybe there are better sounding units, but it's ok )
-Verto MX madi-dante ( which I hooked up an SSL Alphalink 24x24 plus adats, mostly for additional inputs )

Protools Cheesgrater ( Running PT10 HD, lol )
-Focusrite Rednet 5 ( 32x32 ins/outs show up as 2x 192's )
-Still have a couple 192's I can hook up if I really need to. 192's play nice with the Rednet since Rednet can match the latency.

Cisco SG200-26 switch 1 gig switch ( CAT5 cable good enough ). I have one for Dante and another for regular internet/VEPro etc. I keep the Dante stuff separate. The Cisco's are older and cheap as chips, and I set them up according to the Focusrite/Dante recommendations. There are a couple things to watch out for, but if I can figure it out. YOU can most definitely figure it out. The one big one is to avoid letting the switch use green settings. There's another thing to setup, I'd have to go back and verify what exactly. Anyway, the basics are that you should get a quality switch that allows you to turn off power green settings. No fancy settings required, an unmanaged switch could maybe get you there depending on traffic. Pretty sure they were recommending the Cisco SG200 amoung others, so I went with that one. They are a pain to update firmware though, it has to be done though a browser, and for some reason I could not get one switch to update. In any case, I use that one for regular internet as well as VEPRO and it's fine across three slaves plus other stuff like NAS etc.

Buffer settings:
Tend to work at 256 in Logic when doing stuff with VePro and basic scoring stuff. If I have a singer or guest I tend to lower it to 64. I don't tend to lower it to 64 when I do my own guitars and stuff, I can deal with that 256 buffer setting, but some ppl really need lower latency. If the session has alot going on, I might just pull a guide mix and turn off all the tracks I don't need, but this is only if I need to layer stuff and feel I need to reduce the strain. Or i might just freeze some tracks and leave most of it live while I have singers etc tracking. Don't usually go to 32 buffer, feel 64 is fast enough.

( post thought -edit- I caught myself on more than one occasion forgetting to switch the buffer back to 256, and noticed a bit more cpu usage, but I could work at 64 if I really felt the need to. Dante does not seem to care one way or the other )

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 4.33.23 PM.png

Above is the Dante app, and you can see the latency. Keep in mind I run at 48k and I have 16x16, 24x24 and 32x32 streams of audio here. For a total of 72 each way. I don't think the network is even breaking a sweat. And if I really needed to , I could up the latency, right now it's set to .5 msec for the Rednet Pcie, but as you can see, the peak latency I'm seeing is 187 usec and no late packets. The verto has a bit more latency than the Rednet stuff, they show at 166 usec.

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 4.38.08 PM.png Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 5.24.21 PM.png

I love the flexibility, because I can monitor through PT, or through my DAW, and any combination of things. You can save presets of all this, so you can switch between using different audio i/o or from any dante source to any other dante destination. Love it.

Wordclock:
Ok, had to dig around on this aspect. IF you use an external wordclock box, attach it to only one dante equipped interface, and make that the Dante system master. All other Dante equipment will follow. In my case, I still use a Big Ben, and it is hooked up to the Verto ( and SSL ), so it is the house clock. Dante goes to great lengths about how wordclock is stable in the entire system, so you don't need to worry too much about word for any dante enabled unit, so long as they are seen and connected to the Dante network.

Addressing:
No real need to assign IP addresses, if you don't the boxes will self assign, and Dante just connects them. My switch for the Dante stuff is not connected to the internet, it sits alone.

Room Correction:
Ok I use the Sonarworks thing, not the Trinnov. What I notice is that the lowest ( fastest ) setting still introduces latency, but that's the plugin, and I don't think the Trinnov will help here. It has to do with the lower frequencies, and the correction that is being applied. If you use the linear phase setting, the phase response is quite flat, but at the cost of more latency. The Sonarworks has a low latency mode, but it does not correct for phase, and a mixed mode, where it mostly corrects for phase, but not like the linear phase setting. The Sonarworks introduces alot of latency to monitoring. But you know, the room correction is pretty important, so I live with it. I can run it either in PT or in Logic, depending on which system I am monitoring through. When scoring to picture, I run it through and monitor through PT right to the Rednet 2.

You can see what's going on for any Rednet box in their app. It's helpful, but I rarely feel the need to use it.

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 5.10.36 PM.png

Final Thoughts:

It all just works. I tend to forget about it, sometimes I marvel at how much audio is being thrown around, but mostly I forget about it. It also sounds nice, and maybe a bit more clear then other systems I used in the past. I don't hear a big difference using the Big Ben, but habit keeps me using it. To the Virtual Dante version - I DO NOT RECCOMMEND. I tried it, but the latency is too high. I tend to think you would be dissappointed having been used to AVID and Motu stuff. If you do go Dante, I'd go with a hardware sound card all around. Special use cases aside. The Rednet 5 are really cheap these days.
Dante is kinda like going modular. You can add things later, or even have things simply not connected depending on what you are doing. It boxes you in a bit less, since you can hook up anything to it, if it's got the dante interface. Once the device is on the network, it's available to everything there.
 
Last edited:
To the Virtual Dante version - I DO NOT RECCOMMEND. I tried it, but the latency is too high. I tend to think you would be dissappointed having been used to AVID and Motu stuff. If you do go Dante, I'd go with a hardware sound card all around. Special use cases aside. The Rednet 5 are really cheap these days.
Without stepping on toes - there is definitely a time and a place for Dante Virtual Soundcard.
We run 6 studios plus a couple of other machines - and everything is tied together with dante. Its fab once its all going. There's a bit to think about on the network side of things (and sometimes its just easier to get AV based switches depending on your scenario... expensive but they just work without needing bit $ spent on network engineers!)

Anyway I was just chiming in to say that DVS is super useful for things like capturing dante streams on assistant computers, or for comms - or other non-mission critical stuff. And it can be used for mission critical stuff depending on the setup. Obviously with 4ms min latency, there are certain applications where its not ideal. But in others, it is super stable. I've got an installation running at a museum here on DVS going out to 25 channels - and it hasn't ever needed a reset in just over 2 years. (Intel Mac - I have not qualified it on M-based macs)

Finally, the Focusrite Red Line boxes are super. They work like traditional interfaces - so using PCIE (over thunderbolt) for the connection to the computer, and then they also have Protools interface if needed - AND a 32 x 32 channel dante interface (primary AND secondary). Once you get your head around focusrite routing, they're great.

But I still like the RME Dante Digiface. Have run a bunch of projects using these, and they allow me to run on more computers than just those with PCIE cards, and have zero issues with stability or latency. RME are like no other for their USB implementation.

Having not read the OP's original thread, I'm not sure of all context, but happy to chat about anything dante anytime!
 
Ok, This post is for @charlieclouser - I'll take it out of the other thread out of respect for the thread poster. Lemme try and run through.

MacPro Daw machine:
-Focusrite pcie card - this is the main core audio sound card. Solid so far.
-to-
-Focusrite Rednet 2 ( maybe there are better sounding units, but it's ok )
-Verto MX madi-dante ( which I hooked up an SSL Alphalink 24x24 plus adats, mostly for additional inputs )

Protools Cheesgrater ( Running PT10 HD, lol )
-Focusrite Rednet 5 ( 32x32 ins/outs show up as 2x 192's )
-Still have a couple 192's I can hook up if I really need to. 192's play nice with the Rednet since Rednet can match the latency.

Cisco SG200-26 switch 1 gig switch ( CAT5 cable good enough ). I have one for Dante and another for regular internet/VEPro etc. I keep the Dante stuff separate. The Cisco's are older and cheap as chips, and I set them up according to the Focusrite/Dante recommendations. There are a couple things to watch out for, but if I can figure it out. YOU can most definitely figure it out. The one big one is to avoid letting the switch use green settings. There's another thing to setup, I'd have to go back and verify what exactly. Anyway, the basics are that you should get a quality switch that allows you to turn off power green settings. No fancy settings required, an unmanaged switch could maybe get you there depending on traffic. Pretty sure they were recommending the Cisco SG200 amoung others, so I went with that one. They are a pain to update firmware though, it has to be done though a browser, and for some reason I could not get one switch to update. In any case, I use that one for regular internet as well as VEPRO and it's fine across three slaves plus other stuff like NAS etc.

Buffer settings:
Tend to work at 256 in Logic when doing stuff with VePro and basic scoring stuff. If I have a singer or guest I tend to lower it to 64. I don't tend to lower it to 64 when I do my own guitars and stuff, I can deal with that 256 buffer setting, but some ppl really need lower latency. If the session has alot going on, I might just pull a guide mix and turn off all the tracks I don't need, but this is only if I need to layer stuff and feel I need to reduce the strain. Or i might just freeze some tracks and leave most of it live while I have singers etc tracking. Don't usually go to 32 buffer, feel 64 is fast enough.

( post thought -edit- I caught myself on more than one occasion forgetting to switch the buffer back to 256, and noticed a bit more cpu usage, but I could work at 64 if I really felt the need to. Dante does not seem to care one way or the other )

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 4.33.23 PM.png

Above is the Dante app, and you can see the latency. Keep in mind I run at 48k and I have 16x16, 24x24 and 32x32 streams of audio here. For a total of 72 each way. I don't think the network is even breaking a sweat. And if I really needed to , I could up the latency, right now it's set to .5 msec for the Rednet Pcie, but as you can see, the peak latency I'm seeing is 187 usec and no late packets. The verto has a bit more latency than the Rednet stuff, they show at 166 usec.

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 4.38.08 PM.png Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 5.24.21 PM.png

I love the flexibility, because I can monitor through PT, or through my DAW, and any combination of things. You can save presets of all this, so you can switch between using different audio i/o or from any dante source to any other dante destination. Love it.

Wordclock:
Ok, had to dig around on this aspect. IF you use an external wordclock box, attach it to only one dante equipped interface, and make that the Dante system master. All other Dante equipment will follow. In my case, I still use a Big Ben, and it is hooked up to the Verto ( and SSL ), so it is the house clock. Dante goes to great lengths about how wordclock is stable in the entire system, so you don't need to worry too much about word for any dante enabled unit, so long as they are seen and connected to the Dante network.

Addressing:
No real need to assign IP addresses, if you don't the boxes will self assign, and Dante just connects them. My switch for the Dante stuff is not connected to the internet, it sits alone.

Room Correction:
Ok I use the Sonarworks thing, not the Trinnov. What I notice is that the lowest ( fastest ) setting still introduces latency, but that's the plugin, and I don't think the Trinnov will help here. It has to do with the lower frequencies, and the correction that is being applied. If you use the linear phase setting, the phase response is quite flat, but at the cost of more latency. The Sonarworks has a low latency mode, but it does not correct for phase, and a mixed mode, where it mostly corrects for phase, but not like the linear phase setting. The Sonarworks introduces alot of latency to monitoring. But you know, the room correction is pretty important, so I live with it. I can run it either in PT or in Logic, depending on which system I am monitoring through. When scoring to picture, I run it through and monitor through PT right to the Rednet 2.

You can see what's going on for any Rednet box in their app. It's helpful, but I rarely feel the need to use it.

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 5.10.36 PM.png

Final Thoughts:

It all just works. I tend to forget about it, sometimes I marvel at how much audio is being thrown around, but mostly I forget about it. It also sounds nice, and maybe a bit more clear then other systems I used in the past. I don't hear a big difference using the Big Ben, but habit keeps me using it. To the Virtual Dante version - I DO NOT RECCOMMEND. I tried it, but the latency is too high. I tend to think you would be dissappointed having been used to AVID and Motu stuff. If you do go Dante, I'd go with a hardware sound card all around. Special use cases aside. The Rednet 5 are really cheap these days.
Dante is kinda like going modular. You can add things later, or even have things simply not connected depending on what you are doing. It boxes you in a bit less, since you can hook up anything to it, if it's got the dante interface. Once the device is on the network, it's available to everything there.
Brilliant and informative post! Thank you very much. This answers a lot of my questions and assuages many of my doubts. Glad to hear you're using the FerroFish Verto as their boxes are on my list for analog I/O, whether it's from a MADI port or Dante network.

Also glad to hear that the latencies are so low - amazing really - and that the Focusrite card has been trouble-free. Their newly updated (and not yet shipping I think) PCIeNX card would be the one I'd go with. I think it's feature-equivalent to the previous model, but has minor updates to work with Apple Silicon Mac Pros etc.

If I wind up with a Mac Studio then I might wind up using a DAD ThunderCore interface as a bridge from Thunderbolt <> Dante, and that would also provide MADI + ADAT ports as well as however many analog channels I want to pay DAD prices for. Glad to hear confirmation that I should avoid DVS, as I never liked the idea of using DVS and the Mac's built-in Ethernet ports for connection to Dante, so the Focusrite card or the DAD or RME boxes avoid that nicely. Plus the DAD boxes have their own SPQ room correction EQ built-in, although it's fully manual and not automatic in any way as SonarWorks, GLM, or Trinnov is. But it's handy that it runs on DSP directly inside the interface.

For me, Dante would not need to serve as a primary backbone for audio transport, since I already have a MADI link between the Logic and PT rigs, and that works great. But having Dante would allow me to integrate all sorts of nifty expansions (like Trinnov Nova) as needed. So it is tempting to say the least.

Thanks again!
 
Brilliant and informative post! Thank you very much. This answers a lot of my questions and assuages many of my doubts. Glad to hear you're using the FerroFish Verto as their boxes are on my list for analog I/O, whether it's from a MADI port or Dante network.

Also glad to hear that the latencies are so low - amazing really - and that the Focusrite card has been trouble-free. Their newly updated (and not yet shipping I think) PCIeNX card would be the one I'd go with. I think it's feature-equivalent to the previous model, but has minor updates to work with Apple Silicon Mac Pros etc.

If I wind up with a Mac Studio then I might wind up using a DAD ThunderCore interface as a bridge from Thunderbolt <> Dante, and that would also provide MADI + ADAT ports as well as however many analog channels I want to pay DAD prices for. Glad to hear confirmation that I should avoid DVS, as I never liked the idea of using DVS and the Mac's built-in Ethernet ports for connection to Dante, so the Focusrite card or the DAD or RME boxes avoid that nicely. Plus the DAD boxes have their own SPQ room correction EQ built-in, although it's fully manual and not automatic in any way as SonarWorks, GLM, or Trinnov is. But it's handy that it runs on DSP directly inside the interface.

For me, Dante would not need to serve as a primary backbone for audio transport, since I already have a MADI link between the Logic and PT rigs, and that works great. But having Dante would allow me to integrate all sorts of nifty expansions (like Trinnov Nova) as needed. So it is tempting to say the least.

Thanks again!
Go Trinnov. Its amazing. Even more so on rooms with a decent level of treatment already. (There's no such thing as magic acoustics)

Def look into the Red16Line (or 8line) interfaces as an option. They'll likely help - simplify things.

For your dante network. If you don't want to employ a network engineer, or are not willing to get into L2/L3 management / VLANS, then it really is simpler to just have a completely separate DANTE network. The Netgear AV line switches are awesome for "it just works" scenarios.
 
Great thread. Thank you everyone for your sage words. I look forward to going through this more closely this evening.

Longtime Dante user, since 2014, across 5 rooms. All mac pro cylinders with Sonnet chassis and RedNet PCIe cards. Has worked flawlessly (and non-stop) since install. High-end Cisco managed switches really helped make for an easy setup. Currently, moving over to apple silicon in all rooms.

QUESTION: has anyone had success migrating the older Focusrite RedNet PCIe cards for use on Apple silicon? I am hoping a simple driver and/or firmware and/or application update does the trick....

Any experiences appreciated....

-B
 
Last edited:
But I still like the RME Dante Digiface. Have run a bunch of projects using these, and they allow me to run on more computers than just those with PCIE cards, and have zero issues with stability or latency. RME are like no other for their USB implementation.

Having not read the OP's original thread, I'm not sure of all context, but happy to chat about anything dante anytime!
Likewise not wanting to step on toes but my love affair with the the Digiface Dante is well and truly over after an incident last year involving RME on the phone for over an hour on a mission-critical event and they simply could not solve the problem. After 90 minutes we had to abandon the Digiface and go back to DVS which is not without problems either. There is an expression in pro circles …
”You’ve been danted” not without reason! Up to that point the Digiface had worked flawlessly.

Saying all that, Dante is incredibly useful and versatile and now used at every level of the audio industry with whole TV audio networks run on Dante. But it is not for the feint of heart and a good thorough networking knowledge is, I would say, essential.

In a studio scenario where it is set up once and items are just added occasionally it’s probably fine but in larger complex systems get your networking hat on!
 
Last edited:
Likewise not wanting to step on toes but my love affair with the the Digiface Dante is well and truly over after an incident last year involving RME on the phone for over an hour on a mission-critical event and they simply could not solve the problem. After 90 minutes we had to abandon the Digiface and go back to DVS which is not without problems either. There is an expression in pro circles …
”You’ve been danted” not without reason! Up to that point the Digiface had worked flawlessly.

Saying all that, Dante is incredibly useful and versatile and now used at every level of the audio industry with whole TV audio networks run on Dante. But it is not for the feint of heart and a good thorough networking knowledge is, I would say, essential.

In a studio scenario where it is set up once and items are just added occasionally it’s probably fine but in larger complex systems get your networking hat on!
Oooof. Never heard "you've been Dante-d" until now. That's sort of what I've been fearing, especially since I power down my room every night and with the MOTU AVB + MADI it always comes up exactly as I left it. I recently managed to kill a MOTU 112d (power supply issue I think) and when I swapped in a new one I had to rebuild all the assignments using the dreaded "checkerboard matrix" that so many interfaces use, and I realized it had been literally 4+ years since I had to look at that screen.

The only reason I'm even looking at Dante is because some manufacturers seem to include it as a way to avoid putting a ton of more conventional digital I/O formats on the back panel. (Looking at you, Trinnov Nova). I do not mind a ton of MADI + ADAT + AES cabling going all over the room, if only the dang boxes had enough I/O ports to begin with!
 
Oooof. Never heard "you've been Dante-d" until now. That's sort of what I've been fearing, especially since I power down my room every night and with the MOTU AVB + MADI it always comes up exactly as I left it. I recently managed to kill a MOTU 112d (power supply issue I think) and when I swapped in a new one I had to rebuild all the assignments using the dreaded "checkerboard matrix" that so many interfaces use, and I realized it had been literally 4+ years since I had to look at that screen.

The only reason I'm even looking at Dante is because some manufacturers seem to include it as a way to avoid putting a ton of more conventional digital I/O formats on the back panel. (Looking at you, Trinnov Nova). I do not mind a ton of MADI + ADAT + AES cabling going all over the room, if only the dang boxes had enough I/O ports to begin with!
Powering down is not an issue with Dante in my experience.

But I feel that Dante's strength is in large complex systems and also where manufacturers use Dante as an underlying protocol within their own product. For example RTS comms does exactly this and the Dante side 'just works' beneath the surface.

RME (and others) have pushed the idea of Dante in a studio and I can see the attraction- but I can also feel the pain.

(And the "RME-solid drivers" mythology is pure marketing in my experience - they are just as good/bad as others in that area)

There is excellent free taining on Audinate's (Dante's) website:
 
I recently managed to kill a MOTU 112d
Charlie, MOTU may have power supplies available if you want to resurrect the failed 112d. I keep a spare on hand for my 828ES; cost me $30 + shipping direct from MOTU.

There is excellent free taining on Audinate's (Dante's) website:
Are you saying we're certifiable?

PS: I've passed the Level 1 course so, in my case, this is true.
 
Couple things I'd like to add.

-I power down every night. Never had a problem. This aspect is fear mongering at best IMO.
-If you use a seperate switch for audio, and have everything connected to that one switch - the setup should just work.
-If you want to get into complex installation type sub nets and get crazy, sure you can go wild, but it's not essential to get a working studio setup in a one man shop.
-You will have to deal with a matrix type assignment page, just like you do for Motu, except you can save out your presets. If you change the gear, you'll have to adjust.
-I often don't turn on all boxes, and the ones that are on connect with the assignments specified in the matrix. There might be some that can't connect, and these show up as a different icon in the matrix, let's not get too over excited, it's pretty foolproof.
-Can't speak for RME, never used their stuff

As to the Verto MX there are a couple gotchas.
-The wordclock is not internally terminated, so if you use this box as the Dante master clock and the Verto is being fed wordclock from an external houseclock box, you need to terminate the wordclock input to the Verto MX. I did this by attaching a bnc y adapter with the proper ohm termination plug, so it's an easy solution. The Big Ben told me the cable was not terminated ( thank you BB )
-I get some wierdness with the Madi setup if I run at 96K. THe Verto will work at 56 frame at 96K, but not the 64 frame setting. It works at 64 frame for 48k and under but not at 56 frame. I have no idea why, it is what it is I suppose. I run 48K, so I don't really mess with this too much.

I read all that Dante info before jumping in, and i must admit I was a bit uncomfortable thinking I was in over my head. I just wanted a solid working setup. Turns out, alot of my fears were not warranted, and i can say I have a solid setup day in day out. My setup has been tested in real world schedule/scoring tasks and came out with a strong passing grade.

I'm sure a box might go bad now and again, that happens when you use stuff. The Focusrite stuff appears to be well built.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom