Maybe you should have watched the whole thing because that is definitely not the conclusion of the video.I admit, I don't have an hour to watch some navel-gazing video, so I skipped to the conclusion to bottom-line it. He advocates for creating tons of different musical notation schemes, so each individual can choose the one that resonates with their soul.
Sounds great, the more languages the better! Except when you want to collaborate with others, or read what someone else wrote. Current music notation is a universal language. Everyone around the globe who learns it can understand exactly what is intended. If everyone is speaking a different language, interfacing with others becomes a lot more difficult.
Agreed. But it begs the question, who decides the standard? A logical argument could be made that since China has more humans per capita, then Jianpu should be the standard. Or, since more western instruments exist, western notation should be the standard. Regardless of the choice, "musical bitchiness" would still be eternal.If everyone is speaking a different language, interfacing with others becomes a lot more difficult.
I remember that feeling too!notation needed to die when I got put in piano lessons at a young age!
Sometimes it's best to watch a video before you barge in with your feedback on it. Your impression of the video's conclusion is so wildly off-base that you actually believe the point he made is the exact opposite of what he truly said.I admit, I don't have an hour to watch some navel-gazing video, so I skipped to the conclusion to bottom-line it. He advocates for creating tons of different musical notation schemes, so each individual can choose the one that resonates with their soul.
Sounds great, the more languages the better! Except when you want to collaborate with others, or read what someone else wrote. Current music notation is a universal language. Everyone around the globe who learns it can understand exactly what is intended. If everyone is speaking a different language, interfacing with others becomes a lot more difficult.
I think you've missed the (main) point. He is advocating for a single digital language that, if done well (a big IF, but as he says, we [the world, not you & I] have got centuries to figure it out), would allow just the kind of collaborations you're talking about. It's already common for, say, a horn player to use "standard" musical notation while collaborating with a guitarist reading tablature. His proposal is a generalization of that, with a universal(*) representation at its core. And, of course, if I understand correctly, it just happens to be something of interest to his company(ies).He advocates for creating tons of different musical notation schemes, so each individual can choose the one that resonates with their soul.
Sounds great, the more languages the better! Except when you want to collaborate with others, or read what someone else wrote. Current music notation is a universal language. Everyone around the globe who learns it can understand exactly what is intended. If everyone is speaking a different language, interfacing with others becomes a lot more difficult.
Point taken. I probably also need to get more sleep, and shouldn't be posting in my current state. Especially when not fully watching the video. Apologies.Sometimes it's best to watch a video before you barge in with your feedback on it. Your impression of the video's conclusion is so wildly off-base that you actually believe the point he made is the exact opposite of what he truly said.
The point the video makes is that standards shouldn't be necessary in the digital age when no one tool fits every scenario. He argues that the standard should basically be invisible while the person interacting with it can read and write it in whatever format they desire.Agreed. But it begs the question, who decides the standard? A logical argument could be made that since China has more humans per capita, then Jianpu should be the standard. Or, since more western instruments exist, western notation should be the standard. Regardless of the choice, "musical bitchiness" would still be eternal.
I understood his point and agree it's utopian. However, there are still many places on planet Earth where digital technology (instruments, notation describing how to play them) isn't readily accessible. He does acknowledge it may take centuries to develop, so perhaps there's hope for the budding Ethiopian musician. (Bless their heart.)standards shouldn't be necessary in the digital age... It's a bit utopian.