What's new

What are the necessary steps in becoming a successful film composer.

jadedsean

Senior Member
Moderators please delete if against the rules of this page. Hi guys i'm just wondering if any of you kind people could take five mins out to do my survey on what it takes to be a composer in today's industry? I would very much appreciate any participation as it's for my thesis.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5WKZ8J8
 
If I may, my point of view: Success at making music it's just having the opportunity to make the music regardless of the results. Doesn't matter if I make X amount of money from it... or if I become famous with it... zero expectations about the outcome after doing it.
 
Moderators please delete if against the rules of this page. Hi guys i'm just wondering if any of you kind people could take five mins out to do my survey on what it takes to be a composer in today's industry? I would very much appreciate any participation as it's for my thesis.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5WKZ8J8

The first question is '1. Do you think having an understanding of theoretical principles of music is important for a working composer today?'

That's an insult to composers.
 
Hmm... it's questionable.
You have 2 possible answers, not steps :)

1) You're so talented, and your work is brilliant, you're so unique
2) You're not so talented, but you know right people, you have money to pay talented musicians and people for your job

You know, there is a lot of talented people on earth, but unfort. they will never see the light and they will never be used because they are unknown and mostly because of 2.
And it's pretty much same for any job, not only this one.
 
Last edited:
The questions are very clearly framed, and you won't have a representative random sample pool by asking on this forum. This will not produce valid results. It's a bit ironic, really: 1. 'Do you think having an understanding of theoretical principles of empiric research is important for creators of surveys today?

Edit: sorry if that comes across as harsh. I was a bit irritated by the implications of the questions.
 
Sorry, poor survey questions. They are mostly self serving and poorly worded. You would have been better off with a scale if importance with most of these.

My guess is, you are a vocational degree student without the academic support to get this in better shape ..? (At least that was my bitter experience, forgive my meanness)
 
Hmm... it's questionable.
You have 2 possible answers, not steps :)

1) You're so talented, and your work is brilliant, you're so unique
2) You're not so talented, but you know right people, you have money to pay talented musicians and people for your job

You know, there is a lot of talented people on earth, but unfort. they will never see the light and they will never be used because they are unknown and mostly because of 2.
And it's pretty much same for any job, not only this one.

1) That doesn't hold anywhere near as much weight as it did, say, forty five years ago. I personally know some really impressive composers whom have written some of the most moving, profound things I've ever heard, but are completely unknown outside of...say, 5,000 Facebook likes (meant in a sly way, no one should judge someone's success by that model of course). I mean, these composers are capable of competing with some of the elite today...but every time they run into your number:

2) Which is (ask the majority of working composers) what most aspiring composers have to do. Larry David said it baldly: "You need to know somebody".

You could also try paying and getting to know a really good music agent. It might cost you quite a bit, but you were going to spend all of that on libraries you don't really "need" anyway, right? (joking). Investing in a real, well-referenced music agent could be the chance you need...if you conscientiously investigate the potential candidates, you'll learn which agents are rubbing shoulders with the big guys (and gals).

I worked really hard, wrote every day for twelve years, and stumbled upon a popular-in-the-genre musician who was looking to make a comeback. That was nine years ago, and I'm still paying my rent with my music.

So yeah, I did end up knowing somebody.
 
1) That doesn't hold anywhere near as much weight as it did, say, forty five years ago. I personally know some really impressive composers whom have written some of the most moving, profound things I've ever heard, but are completely unknown outside of...say, 5,000 Facebook likes (meant in a sly way, no one should judge someone's success by that model of course). I mean, these composers are capable of competing with some of the elite today...but every time they run into your number:

2) Which is (ask the majority of working composers) what most aspiring composers have to do. Larry David said it baldly: "You need to know somebody".

You could also try paying and getting to know a really good music agent. It might cost you quite a bit, but you were going to spend all of that on libraries you don't really "need" anyway, right? (joking)

Absolutely, there is a lot of variations to this answer, but I tend to short that best possible way :)
 
I will give you one clue now



Listen this music with attention, especially intro (first minute or two). It's recorded sometimes in 2009 by Józef Skrzek.
How it's sounds like? :)
 
The first question is '1. Do you think having an understanding of theoretical principles of music is important for a working composer today?'

That's an insult to composers.

The point of the study is aimed at absolute beginners so questions are designed with these principals in mind, and if a seasoned composer is doing this survey my hope is he or she will understand the basic in nature of questions and realize it's aimed at beginners. Its worth pointing out, the survey benefits from the experience of real working composers as well because real experience is valuable to any beginner. I also don't feel the first question is an insult as i know some people have never learnt any theory and have an intuitive ability to write music without any form of education.
 
The questions are very clearly framed, and you won't have a representative random sample pool by asking on this forum. This will not produce valid results. It's a bit ironic, really: 1. 'Do you think having an understanding of theoretical principles of empiric research is important for creators of surveys today?

Edit: sorry if that comes across as harsh. I was a bit irritated by the implications of the questions.

It was never my intention to irritate anyone. I just felt beginners might actually benefit from composers that are actively working in the industry or working towards a career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muk
Question bias aside, I don't mean to be a naysayer, but how is an unsourced, unattributable online survey, the link of which you post publicly...considered good enough evidence for a thesis at any academic institution?

It's not evidence of anything surely, unless you know the source. Anybody can click on that link and take it. It seems like a baffling methodology for something you're actually intending to submit academically?
 
Sorry, poor survey questions. They are mostly self serving and poorly worded. You would have been better off with a scale if importance with most of these.

My guess is, you are a vocational degree student without the academic support to get this in better shape ..? (At least that was my bitter experience, forgive my meanness)

It's funny i came to this forum because i felt composers might want to give their thoughts and experience of what it's like working in the industry. Instead it seems all people want to do is correct the survey itself, i apologize the survey isn't up to your standards as it's just a test as i wanted to gauge responses coming from this site.
 
Are there steps? Make good music, and network with others. Done? There's no formula to success. I think Bo Burnham said it best: "Taylor Swift telling you to follow your dreams is like a lottery winner telling you, 'Liquidize your assets, buy Powerball tickets, it works!'"

Super cool analogy.
 
It's funny i came to this forum because i felt composers might want to give their thoughts and experience of what it's like working in the industry. Instead it seems all people want to do is correct the survey itself, i apologize the survey isn't up to your standards as it's just a test as i wanted to gauge responses coming from this site.

Oh, I'm sorry, it's our fault. Of course.

I think if you take a few minutes you'll find literally thousands upon thousands of posts of composers sharing their thoughts about what it's like working in the industry. I'm not sure why you think the site owes you anything or the many working composers on it need to take your survey, particularly when the questions are kind of loaded and seem to be yielding a certain bias.

This is the real world; we don't sugarcoat stuff to your feelings and we owe you zip. Everybody is nice here, but ask not great questions and people will say "hey, that's not a great question". If you don't like that, tough. There are people here who routinely score $50m-$100m movies and video games...owners of companies...software and sampling pioneers, hobbyists who make the pros look lame. This is not high school.

As such, we can look at your questions and say they're poor. "what genre of film scoring do you consider most effective" for one, with answers being a range of dates. Firstly, dates aren't genres. Secondly, the question is over simplistic as to be meaningless...1980's could mean anything from Williams to Carpenter to the smooth jazz sax music on a soft porn movie. I mean, c'mon, get real, you're kind of insulting people's intelligence.
 
Question bias aside, I don't mean to be a naysayer, but how is an unsourced, unattributable online survey, the link of which you post publicly...considered good enough evidence for a thesis at any academic institution?

It's not evidence of anything surely, unless you know the source. Anybody can click on that link and take it. It seems like a baffling methodology for something you're actually intending to submit academically?

The surveys is aimed at an active community of composers
Question bias aside, I don't mean to be a naysayer, but how is an unsourced, unattributable online survey, the link of which you post publicly...considered good enough evidence for a thesis at any academic institution?

It's not evidence of anything surely, unless you know the source. Anybody can click on that link and take it. It seems like a baffling methodology for something you're actually intending to submit academically?

Well for one its aimed a community of composers so the likelihood of anybody doing the survey is slim.
Oh, I'm sorry, it's our fault. Of course.

I think if you take a few minutes you'll find literally thousands upon thousands of posts of composers sharing their thoughts about what it's like working in the industry. I'm not sure why you think the site owes you anything or the many working composers on it need to take your survey, particularly when the questions are kind of loaded and seem to be yielding a certain bias.

This is the real world; we don't sugarcoat stuff to your feelings and we owe you zip. Everybody is nice here, but ask not great questions and people will say "hey, that's not a great question". If you don't like that, tough. There are people here who routinely score $50m-$100m movies and video games...owners of companies...software and sampling pioneers, hobbyists who make the pros look lame. This is not high school.

As such, we can look at your questions and say they're poor. "what genre of film scoring do you consider most effective" for one, with answers being a range of dates. Firstly, dates aren't genres. Secondly, the question is over simplistic as to be meaningless...1980's could mean anything from Williams to Carpenter to the smooth jazz sax music on a soft porn movie. I mean, c'mon, get real, you're kind of insulting people's intelligence.

Cheers for your input, if you read my previous post you would see i stated it was never my intention to insult anybody on this forum, if anything i felt the survey was innocent in nature. Yeah of course the questions could be improved upon but again as stated it's a test survey to gauge responses coming from this website. By the way i never suggested this community owes me anything i merely made the point the survey is for beginners and would appreciate any help from experienced composers. I don't understand why your wasting your time energy on this, if you have done the survey thank you for your participation and your criticism i will take on board.
 
Last edited:

>as i know some people have never learnt any theory and have an intuitive ability to write music without any form of education.

And I know someone who was abducted by aliens. Your turn.
 
Last edited:
You would be amazed at how many members of this forum adamantly disagree

And while I won't say how I feel about it, I'd hate to see this thread fly in this direction... many "modern" composers couldn't tie their shoes without a computer holding their hand

Mediocre talents like Mozart, Van Beethoven, Wagner, Debussy and so on needed lessons, but the kids nowadays are so smart, I guess they could become anything, from composers to theoretical physicists, without having to study. It's because of those wonderful computers. I wished I was born a couple of decades later. When I was a teenager, all you had to write music was some paper, a pencil and an old piano. And a brain of course.

Is this the right flight direction? :rofl:
 
Top Bottom