pinki
Senior Member
What a beautiful film. Just out from it now. Fabiulous in every way. Music (of course), cinematography, direction, the two central performances, the script, the whole thing. Bravo
Last edited:
Mahler 2The scene in the cathedral with Bradley Cooper conducting (what I think was) Bernstein's Mass...how extraordinary. He directed, co-wrote, produced and starred in the leading role, never mind his conducting skills!
I made it about 35 minutes in before I realized it was not going to be a movie about his musical life (other than tangentially to his romantic life). I guess I am not a romantic at heart as I quickly lost interest and turned it off.I left feeling a little bit empty, but maybe I had the wrong expectations. For me, I wanted to know how the man grew musically from young to old? What did he go through to develop such a prodigious talent? What mistakes did he make that he learned from and built upon? I felt like the movie mostly stated that he was a genius and then focused on his sexuality and infidelity. I would have liked to see more in-depth musical growth. That to me, is what makes him interesting. So for me personally, it felt like a missed opportunity even though I simultaneously marveled at the performances and the production.
It’s interesting how expectations affect our perceptions. I think because I read the negative review before seeing the film, I ended up enjoying it likely more than if I hadn’t seen the review.I left feeling a little bit empty, but maybe I had the wrong expectations. For me, I wanted to know how the man grew musically from young to old? What did he go through to develop such a prodigious talent? What mistakes did he make that he learned from and built upon? I felt like the movie mostly stated that he was a genius and then focused on his sexuality and infidelity. I would have liked to see more in-depth musical growth. That to me, is what makes him interesting. So for me personally, it felt like a missed opportunity even though I simultaneously marveled at the performances and the production.
Definitely understand what you are saying. I guess I knew beforehand it wasn’t going to deliver on that front and I thought it was going to be a low life swipe at him around his sexuality. But instead what I found was gloriously musical film making around a beautiful and very real feeling love story.I left feeling a little bit empty, but maybe I had the wrong expectations. For me, I wanted to know how the man grew musically from young to old? What did he go through to develop such a prodigious talent? What mistakes did he make that he learned from and built upon? I felt like the movie mostly stated that he was a genius and then focused on his sexuality and infidelity. I would have liked to see more in-depth musical growth. That to me, is what makes him interesting. So for me personally, it felt like a missed opportunity even though I simultaneously marveled at the performances and the production.
I haven’t seen it yet but “any questions?” Comes from the last like in Candide which is a brilliant score! I’m excited to see the film.Definitely understand what you are saying. I guess I knew beforehand it wasn’t going to deliver on that front and I thought it was going to be a low life swipe at him around his sexuality. But instead what I found was gloriously musical film making around a beautiful and very real feeling love story.
I guess @patrick76 is right about expectations!
The last line …”Any questions?”. .. very clever.
That isn't what it was about. No reason it should be. We can find all that stuff out easily enough. This was about two people and the bond they shared despite the complexity of their personalities. I personally find "origin story" biographies boring and often woefully inaccurate.I left feeling a little bit empty, but maybe I had the wrong expectations. For me, I wanted to know how the man grew musically from young to old?
It is reasonable to have expected something different based on the title. But perhaps the term "maestro" has a broader meaning in this case and was used with some intended irony. He was not a maestro in his personal life.Here’s one reason why the film should have been more about Bernstein the musician: it was named Maestro.
Don‘t get me wrong. I thought it was a good film as is, but it‘s reasonable to have expected something different.
. . .But as far as his art and his technique is concerned, I found this 2 hour DVD absolutely incredible. Insight on top of insight as far as phrasing and handling dynamics is concerned, especially when looking at the score and this side by side: